Farmer Freedom

 Here’s another example of religious programming that attacks animal agriculture.  This GN magazine video quotes scripture to attack pork.  Missouri producers in all animal agriculture sectors are at risk from activists who use religion to attack modern farming and consumer food preferences.

Here’s part one of a series of posts on how the HSUS is so effective at attacking animal agriculture. This series will help educate Missouri farmers on the true nature of the threat from HSUS and other activist organizations. The ideas discussed here were developed by Wes Jamison, Ph.D., associate professor of communication at Palm Beach Atlantic University.

Jamison says one of the ways that HSUS is so successful in attacking animal agriculture is because it uses very effective communications techniques to get people to think differently about their food. Using religious themes to gain funding and political support is at their heart of their effort.

Here’s how the HSUS faith-based communications approach works:

Step 1 — Target pet owners and use their feelings about companion animals to undermine animal agriculture. People who love their cat or dog are made to feel bad about having one animal as a “family member” while eating other animals. In other words, people are encouraged to view production agriculture animals in the same way they view their pets.

Step 2 — Tell pet owners that eating animals is cruel and morally wrong.

Step 3 — Make people feel guilty for using animals as food.

Step 4 — Don’t ask people to change and actually stop eating meat. Instead ask them to “help stop/reduce the suffering” by contributing money or giving political support to HSUS.

You can read more about how the HSUS is using religion as a rallying point by clicking here to visit the HSUS “Faith Outreach” Web site.

Check back over the next few days for some YouTube videos showing how popular preachers who reach millions of consumers are talking about animal agriculture.

Livestock producers in many states including Missouri are keeping a close eye on Ohio, where agriculture leaders recently reached a compromise with the Humane Society of the United States.

A recent article by the Dayton Daily news seems to indicate that not all livestock producers there are comfortable with the compromise. According to the article, some farmers are now considering egg and hog farm locations just over Ohio’s borders in Indiana and Pennsylvania. Those states and many others don’t allow citizens to place animal welfare and other issues on the ballot for voters to decide.

To read the entire article please click here.